Three of Jacks (20061030)

Jack'o'lanterns by the FMA, Chisana Hime and Diego Montoya. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006 Jack'o'lanterns by the FMA, Chisana Hime and Diego Montoya. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006 This year's Halloween decorations. Note that the FMA decided to go with a traditional carving, since this was her first All Hallow's, and that big smile looks just as creepy as the other two. Have a good one, everybody.

Morning Chiaroscuro at Angkor (20060710)

Eastern gallery corridor, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Eastern gallery corridor, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Angkor Wat's fame may come from its size, but its charm most certainly comes from the small details. On my third day at visiting the Angkorian temples, I hit Angkor Wat early in the morning and found myself enthralled by the way the early sunlight played on, off of and through the temple complex. Little things, like this optical illusion in one of the famous bas-relief gallery hallways, have become my favorite memories of the place.

Headless but Happy (20060710)

Headless Buddha statue, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Headless Buddha statue, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. There's little more to this photo than what you see. I'm sure there's a fascinating story as to where this poor statue's head has gone. Perhaps he had a fight with another statue down the hall about a woman - I've been told this is the kind of thing that statues often lose their heads over. The mysteries of Angkor are many, but maybe the ghost head on the wall behind this statue knows more than it's saying. Besides, aren't all buddhas supposed to be content?

Indy? Is That You? (20060709)

Inside Preah Khan, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Inside Preah Khan, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. No Photoshop trickery here. I got nuthin', except a fun shot from the inside of the same Angkor temple where Angelina Jolie filmed her "Tomb Raider" movie.Preah Khan was interesting because it was one of the few temples still left unrestored. Covered in vines, tree roots and other miscellaneous foliage, it looked like what the FMA said she expected the entire Angkor complex to look like: remote temples swallowed by the jungle, the last remnants of a long-dead race. Of course, that's not how things are now. Vendors have practically barricaded the areas in front of the temples, and archaeologists are doing their best to restore the temples to learn as much about them as they can. It's easy to understand why, too: it's difficult to study a building when its defining feature is covered in a 40-foot by 10-foot tangle of tree roots. Photos of Bayon temple as recent as 10 years ago show the faces framed and entangled by vines, enticing but perhaps not practical for research and longevity. One day, they'll have cleaned the lichens off the interior and cut away the trees, but for now, Preah Khan keeps some of its secrets hidden by that mysterious jungle.

Head of the Class (20060708)

Faces at Bayon Temple, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Faces at Bayon Temple, Angkor Wat, Cambodia. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Although it's not as famous as its well-known predecessor, Angkor Wat, I found the massive heads and intricate details of the Bayon Temple to be far more intriguing. Comparing the two is the grown-up version of comparing favorite superheroes or baseball players. Everybody's got their reasons, of course. To recap mine: the overwhelming detail combined with the enormous faces makes for some seriously intruiging architecture. This photo was fun to work on, as well. I shot it early in the morning, originally, and the lighting turned the stone uniformly gray. It didn't quite have the punch I was hoping for, so I gave it a sepia tone and performed some trickery to bring out the heads in the foreground. Hope you all like it.

Free in their Hearts, I Hope (20060331)

Young monks at Wat Sainyaphum, Savannaket, Laos. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. Young monks at Wat Sainyaphum, Savannaket, Laos. Seth Rosenblatt (c) 2006. This photo really captures my experience with the young monks of Laos: Despite growing up in harsh conditions, sent away from their families to study at the monastery - if they could afford it - they're still just inquisitive children at heart. Many of these boys and young men in orange would approach me and speak in halting English. Obviously, they were practicing, but they were responsive to my questions, as well. And please, don't misinterpret my joking headline. I saw no evidence that they were being held against their will. On the contrary, I didn't meet a single kid who said he would rather be working in the fields. However, because of the restrictions placed on them, the wouldn't speak with the FMA. They would smile at her, usually somewhat sheepishly, but they only spoke to me or asked about my life.

Straight to the Top (20061019)

Photograph removed at the request of the Golden Gate Bridge Transportation District. Growing up in San Francisco, I can't say that I never thought about what the world looked like from the top of the Golden Gate Bridge. But I considered it in the same mental breath that I thought about, say, taking a weekend to the moon. I can't tell you jack about the view from the moon, but from the top of the Golden Gate Bridge's South Tower, the world is both narrower and a whole lot wider.I was lucky enough that my Dad knew somebody who could get him to the top, and probably even luckier that he asked me if I wanted to join him. (As opposed to my mother, sister or my Financial and Menu Adviser.) When he asked, it wasn't like I had to sit there and think long and hard about whether to go. The only question I had was, "When?" That turned out to be its own little debacle. There's no point in visiting the top of the Golden Gate Bridge if it's foggy, and it's foggy quite a lot around here. So the original day of the visit got cancelled at the last minute, and we rescheduled. What a boon that was - the new day of Our Elevation, October 19th, started not only with a cloudless blue sky, but it was warm and windless as well. We got to the bridge and met Amorette Ko, our guide to the top. We crammed into a tiny golf-cartesque vehicle and trundled along the bridge's pedestrian walkway. When we got out, she opened a door in the side of the tower and we crammed into a tiny elevator installed when the bridge was under construction in 1934. Made by the Otis Elevator company and designed to hold one man at a time, with the three of us squished in there it was like riding a Tokyo subway train vertically at rush-hour. The view from the top was vertiginous, but it's not like rides to the top of the Golden Gate are common, so there was nothing for me to do except swallow my pride and my breakfast and not think about the fact that I was around 750 feet above the bay. There wasn't a breeze or a cloud up there, although I did see one hawk swoop and rise on the invisible thermals. The platform is narrow and long, about 40 feet by ten feet. The catwalks around the edges of the towers were nothing more than corrugated metal and a one-bar handrail. Looking down, cars were zipping by on the 101. Tour boats and tankers chugged under the orange superstructure, leaving foamy white trails pierced by the blue-green water behind them. We could see Mount Diablo off in the East Bay, and the mountain behind it as well. The whole world seemed to take on an airplane perspective that you only get when you're far above everything else; even the thin line of orange haze on the horizon became something more than airborne toxins. All of reality tends to flatten out as the brain struggles to process being so damn high in the air. The symbolism of standing on top of the Golden Gate Bridge also struck me as being important. One of the least-articulated aspects of the bridge, any bridge, is the role of its design. Aesthetically, the Golden Gate is instantly recognizable, simple and yet full of little flourishes that make it unique, charming and memorable. The shape of the vertical support cables that hold the main ones in place, the ridged fronts on the towers - it's all essential. To change or remove one aspect of it would be to diminish the whole. Any bridge, though, is more than merely a crossing: they are living, functional symbols of humanity's attempt to integrate itself into its surroundings, not just dominate them. We could dam a river, but that irrevocably changes the entire environment, flora and fauna be damned. A bridge is something more, a literal and symbolic connecting of two disparate halves that seeks to become part of a landscape. So standing on the top of the bridge initially struck me as being a defiant posture, an arrogant middle-finger pointed at a man-made contruct that wonderfully transcends mankind, but that I was greedily taking advantage of. The longer I was up there, though, the more I changed my mind. Atop the bridge that makes not just every San Franciscan's heart, but everybody's heart skip just a bit whenever they approach it, I realized that we were still part of it. At the very top, with nothing preventing us from falling to our deaths except a decades-old metal rail, blessed with a unique view that very few people ever get to experience, we were still part of the bridge and part of its experience, as much as it has now become just a bit more a part of mine. I can only hope that travelling to the top becomes something that more people get to do.

Next Page →